10.31.09

Never Deceive a Duke, by Liz Carlyle

Posted in book 'em Danno tagged at 12:38 pm by Mala

Liz Carlyle’s 2008 release Never Deceive a Duke, leaves me with the same conundrum as Wicked All Day did: I can’t figure out what the title has to do with anything. Yes, there is a duke, but who’s doing the deceiving? Not that I’m necessarily in favor of titles that tell you exactly what’s going on. If it were a standard Harlequin category romance, it would probably be called The Jewish Duke’s Widowed Secret Lover or something.

Yes, you read that right: Gabriel Gareth Lloyd, the hero of a historical romance, is Jewish. For that alone, I picked up the book, because there is a dearth of historical romance featuring anybody but your standard Christian rakes (and the half-Indian, half-Gypsy “exotic” rakes, of course). The story didn’t disappoint at all…even if the set-up reminded me a little of Carlyle’s A Woman Scorned.

Gareth Lloyd has worked with Neville Shipping for years, shutting his dark past away, but then his cousin, the Duke of Warneham, dies under suspicious circumstances. With four wives under the duke’s belt and no children, the only person left to inherit the title and the estates is Gareth. When he begrudgingly takes on the responsibility, he meets the duchess Antonia, a fragile 26-year-old, whom everyone suspects may have killed her much older husband.

Never Deceive a Duke is about reckoning with grief, about reconciling one’s past, and having the courage to move on. And Gareth’s Jewish heritage — his father was disowned for marrying Ruth and after their deaths, Gareth was raised by her parents — is a key part of that theme. I loved when he explained the concept of shiva to Antonia, assuring her that there is no shame in giving mourning its due. Despite being brought up by the Gottfrieds, at least until terrible tragedies struck and changed his life forever, Gareth is more or less raised Christian. Or at least secular. Which makes sense, given the era. His mother wanted him to be able to conform to his father’s world. But as Gareth tells Antonia, in his heart he’s absolutely Jewish. And the reader gets glimpses of that in the form of flashbacks to a wee Gabriel with his “Bubbe” and “Zayde.”

It’s a great concept, and a wonderful way to diversify the romantic historical canvas. Speaking of diversification, there is also the inclusion of Carlyle’s recurring character, George Kemble. International man of mystery, interior decorator, valet…is there anything he can’t do? A particular scene between Gareth, Kemble and Rothewell (the hero of Never Romance a Rake) had me laughing out loud on the subway. Kemble’s sexuality is not explicitly stated in this book, but he’s definitely gay (which I confirmed upon reading an earlier Carlyle work, The Devil To Pay). And I appreciated that Carlyle draws no link between that and some of the horrors* Gareth experienced as a youth. Too many romance authors use homosexuality as a villainous device that goes hand-in-hand with child abuse. It’s despicable and irresponsible.

Carlyle’s Never Deceive a Duke is anything but that. And with both Gareth and Kemble, she reboots the idea of what a romance novel hero “should be.” Here’s hoping more authors follow her lead. 

*Just a warning that, yes, this book does discuss issues of rape in pretty stark terms, so steer clear if you’re triggered by such things.

10.30.09

Tricks, treats and Dorian’s big, gay wedding

Posted in tv talk tagged , at 10:21 pm by Mala

I was watching As the World Turns today, and I kept flipping over to One Life to Live during the commercials to get hits like a crack addict needing a fix. And, well, I missed a lot, so I rewatched the big, gay wedding tonight (I love that absolutely everybody, in Llanview and offscreen, is calling it that).

Téa implying the awesome Ross Rayburn is dangerous (gee, we know where this is going) and the Mannings as the Fantastic Four aside (Todd, I know Reed Richards, and you, sir, are no Reed Richards), I was really entertained. So much character-based work, so many gems in terms of dialogue. And, no, I’m not just talking about Kyle and Fish. Other aspects were really wonderful as well. The pair-up of David and Destiny and their quest to rescue Matthew is genius. Tuc Watkins brings the best out in young Shenell Edmonds; they’re hilarious together and the bond really allows David to show his gentle side. Having David reflect on his relationship with Dorian (while flying coach — gasp!) as Dorian did much the same amidst the cacophony of the mass wedding was perfect. Then there is the power pairing of Bo and Nora. Robert S. Woods and Hillary B. Smith are still magic together. How great was Nora trying to rationalize their kisses while Bo called her “Red,” and ultimately confessed he still loves her? (I confess, I may have gotten a little weak-kneed, Mr. Woods. Well played.)

Even the teens, who I have no real investment in, in were fabulous. Unlike their PSA-style discussion of Big Gay Issues of a few days ago, their scenes today were sweet and organic. I cracked up when Markko and Cole awkwardly announced they love each other and then a beaming Langston and Starr joined them.

Langston: I’ve always wanted to be Mrs. Starr Manning.
Starr: Oh, honey, you didn’t tell me you were taking my name!

And, yes, now is when I talk about Fish. I thought his fit  a few weeks back with Ross in the Llanview PD squad room was eyebrow-raising, but his outburst today beats all. Sure it may have been a tad bit over-the-top, but Fish has about 25 years of repressing these emotions to make up for. And they all came pouring forth as he outed himself to everyone and blasted the protesters for their bigotry. Scott Evans sold it so well. A beautiful companion to Fish’s tirade was Kyle in the background, Brett Claywell’s face speaking volumes, as he restlessly played with the rabbit’s foot Roxy had given him for luck.

It was an hour full of big moments and little moments…all of which added up to one really effective episode.

10.27.09

Soap Opera Weekly: Blogging With Mala

Posted in tv talk tagged , , , at 4:32 pm by Mala

Yes, today was the day that “Elizabeth’s first love” returned on GH, and I’ll get to that, but let me talk about OLTL’s Kyle’s first love, Fish, first! 

I’m a sucker for two characters really digging deep into the core of their relationship. And, as we all know, I’m a sucker for Kyle and Fish in general. They could sit around reading a milk carton and I’d be entranced. Luckily, OLTL gave us a little bit more than that to work with! As Fish pleaded with Kyle today not to marry Nick, both Scott Evans and Brett Claywell delivered their signature heartfelt, organic performances. Evans imbues Fish with such vulnerability — my heart broke for him when he wept alone in the hallway — and Claywell’s hoarse voice and thickening drawl so effectively conveyed Kyle desperately trying to push Fish away rather than let himself be hurt again. “You’re not ready for me!” Kyle cried, urging Fish to go out and try gay bars and dating. “Then wait for me!” Fish begged, but it was clear that Kyle can’t. He’s already waited too long for Fish to walk beside him hand in hand. 

My favorite soap relationships are ones that feel like we, the viewer, are intruding upon real people. Whether it’s friendship or romance, I like that authenticity. Kyle and Fish bring that in spades, and watching them hurt and hurt each other makes me ache in turn! 

Speaking of people hurting each other, nice to know that Jonathan Jackson’s return doesn’t make Lucky any less of a dupe! As much as the old school LL2 (that’s Lucky and Liz, for the uninitiated) fan in me was all aflutter seeing Jackson and Rebecca Herbst together again after all this time, my pitter-pattering heart quickly skipped several beats when all Elizabeth could do was have hot flashes er, fantasies about Nikolas. I mean, I’ve loved Lucky and Elizabeth this whole time, no matter who was in the role. I’ve wanted them to reunite through Jackson, Jacob Young, and definitely Greg Vaughan. So what’s the point of bringing back the original recipe Lucky if he’s still second fiddle to somebody else in Liz’s life? First Jason, then Ric, then Jason again, and now the Dark Prince? Okay, okay, so rationally I know that they couldn’t exactly switch the entire story in one episode and change it to a pro-Lucky tale…but, on the other hand, if you can swap out the actor so cavalierly, why not the tone, too? As long as we’re swallowing that Lucky suddenly got shorter and needs to shave his scruff, I will gladly believe that Elizabeth doesn’t want Nikolas at all and their sexcapades have been a bad dream!

originally posted on soapoperaweekly.com

10.26.09

Soap characters and taking sides

Posted in tv talk tagged , , , at 7:35 am by Mala

I don’t know if this means I’m perversely ornery or what, but when a canon tells me that a character is root-worthy, to the point of slanting stories to show how sympathetic or wonderful or favored they are, I inevitably run screaming in the opposite direction. And sometimes, I even start rooting for whoever their enemy is. That’s not to say that any time a TV show has a fair-haired boy I’m against them…it’s just when the character is being insufferably painted as perfect and right. Nobody is perfect, not even if canon deems it so!

Case in point, Alles Was Zahlt’s Stella Coretti. I just think she’s such a pompous snot. Sure, Jenny schemed against her and pushed Lars off the wagon, but there’s something infinitely more human about Jenny, because for all her scheming, not only does she have faults but she’s allowed to acknowledge them. Stella, who is now keeping a secret of her own (that she has diabetes), still acts like she can sit in judgment of everyone. (Okay, more specifically Marian, whom I adore.) Then there’s One Life to Live’s Gigi and Rex, whom the show positioned as a root-for couple: soulmates, brought together again after years and years apart, blah bliddy blah. But good lord they’re prigs. And to have to say that about Rex is especially disturbing. Remember when he was interesting? When he was as dirty as they come? I’ve started cheering for Kim, Stacy and, by extension Schuyler, to take them down! Of course, that ultimately means sticking poor Sky with Gigi and I don’t know that he deserves that. (Rex, however, totally has the karmic payback of being stuck with Stacy coming to him.)

Probably the most significant case of me vs. whoever the show wants me to side with is General Hospital’s Sonny and Jason. No, they’re not good and pure and right…but they’re good and pure and right mobsters — which, in and of itself, is ridiculous. They supposedly don’t traffic in drugs or hookers. What it is they actually do (how does the money they launder get so darn filthy?) has never been clarified. But darn it, they’re the heroes of Port Charles, keeping it safe from…from…uh, other criminals. Yeah, it’s kind of insane. So you know what? I loved Faith, I loved Jerry, and I love whoever the heck James Franco is playing, just on the principle that their raison d’etre is to make trouble for Team Sason.

A little demented? Sure. But much like Jenny or Kim or Faith Rosco, I’ve never claimed to be anything else!

10.24.09

Setting the scene for romance

Posted in desi talk, general rambling tagged , at 9:40 pm by Mala

When you’re talking about some of the most romantic movie sequences of all time, everyone has things that instantly come to mind. All you have to say to a fan of recent Bollywood movies is “the gazebo scene,” and they automatically know what you’re talking about: 1998’s Kuch Kuch Hota Hai; Rahul and Anjali share a dance to no music, until the tension becomes so heightened that the spell doesn’t break until Anjali sees her engagement ring on her finger and must tear herself away and bolt into the rain. It’s such a memorable moment that Tarun Mansukhani paid homage to it in 2008’s Dostana, having Kunal recreate the gazebo dance in order to woo Neha. I can safely that if any guy ever did that for me, I’d be a goner.

James Cameron’s 1984 classic Terminator has, at its core, the story of Kyle Reese’s deep devotion to Sarah Connor. And while most people quote “I’ll be back,” it’s “I came across time for you,” and “we loved a lifetime’s worth” that I remember more clearly. Battle-weary Kyle losing his virginity to Sarah in a few stolen hours of happiness is achingly gorgeous, and the visual of their clasped hands during the act is, to me, the sharpest image from the film.

Han Solo and Princess Leia’s kiss aboard the Millenium Falcon in 1980’s The Empire Strikes Back is famous, but it’s later, in Bespin, that their romance reaches its peak: when their gazes lock just before Han is dropped into carbonite and Leia finally admits she loves him…and he offers up, “I know,” with the last of his cocky bravado. The princess and the smuggler, the most improbable of partners and the most inopportune time for a confession of love, and yet one of the most resonant scenes in the entire trilogy.

Resonant in an altogether different way is how Baby seduces Johnny in 1987’s Dirty Dancing, invading his room with her potent combination of privilege and innocence, asking him to dance with her. Solomon Burke’s “Cry To Me” is one of the sexiest songs on the planet because of them, and I was one of millions of women who fell in love with the late Patrick Swayze all because of Johnny Castle’s confident moves  on the dance floor and his vulnerability everywhere else.

What’s the unifying factor in all the examples I’ve brought up? Certainly not a crisp script. Most of these scenes didn’t involve much dialogue and what dialogue there was…wasn’t exactly Shakespearean in nature. The key to romance isn’t pretty words or even good direction and the right music, it’s people whose connection is just that believable. It takes a solid story, fleshed out characters, actors who embody those roles… and just a touch of magic.

And then, if you’re lucky…? Kuch kuch hota hai. Something happens.

10.22.09

Jellicoe Road, by Melina Marchetta

Posted in book 'em Danno tagged at 7:15 am by Mala

Sometimes, when a book or a move are overhyped, I brace for impact, expecting my experience with it to be a letdown. Thankfully, this was not the case with Melina Marchetta’s critically acclaimed Jellicoe Road, which was released in 2006 in Australia and then in 2008 here in the States —interestingly enough, the Australian release is called On The Jellicoe Road, and I have no idea why they dropped the preposition. The book is at points both stark and dream-like, and Marchetta does a wonderful job of balancing wistful, almost ethereal, instances of then with sturdier, wry instances of now. And she also pulls no punches with the issues of violence, death and abuse.

Taylor Markham has lived at the Jellicoe School ever since her junkie mother dumped her off at a 7/11 and left her to be cared for by the mysterious Hannah, who has a house near the school’s property. Every year, the kids from the Jellicoe School fight a war for territory with the Townies and the Cadets who camp nearby for a term. When it comes Taylor’s turn to lead, stories that hold the key to her past follow. Tough to the point of almost reveling in her solitude, Taylor’s journey on the Jellicoe Road opens her up to surprising friendships, a romance and learning what family means to her.

It’s hard to talk about the book without giving too much away, because part of the joy of reading it was making each connection and having an “ah-ha!” moment. And I want to go back and reread it over and over to catch the things I didn’t grab the first time around. In fact, while reading I kept flipping back to check things. It’s a book that made me laugh, that made my throat tighten up, and also really engaged my brain. 

This copy has to go back to the library, but I’m definitely buying my own as soon as possible, so that I may travel down the Jellicoe Road with Marchetta’s memorable characters and engaging story over and over again.

10.21.09

Soap Opera Weekly: Blogging With Mala

Posted in tv talk tagged , , at 3:36 pm by Mala

“Elizabeth’s first love is back,” touts an ABC/SOAPnet promo for Jonathan Jackson’s Oct. 27 return. (Check it out here) Uh, guys…? Elizabeth’s first love NEVER LEFT. He’s right there. In Port Charles. Wearing Greg Vaughan’s face.

I mean, I can only imagine how hamstrung the ABC/SOAPnet promotional department was, realizing that they couldn’t go “the real Lucky returns!” route — darn all those fans for finding that genius move for AMC’s Greenlee offensive! — but was it necessary to sit around and think of something just as bad?

Guess what, GH: Lucky and Liz have always been a permanent lock. It doesn’t matter if it was Jackson or Jacob Young or Greg Vaughan in the role. But way to confirm, yet again, for viewers that the Lucky character has had no value for the last decade…that all of that history and character work and the times Lucky and Elizabeth have been drawn together as lovers and as parents hasn’t rated because it wasn’t Jonathan Jackson. To outright say that is really, really bold.

I guess I imagined the 2005 wedding and all the adorable family scenes with Cameron and Jake, because Elizabeth’s only hookups were with Jason, Ric and Zander. And what about Jacob Young’s Daytime Emmy? I guess he won that for AMC’s JR…even before he got the role.

It’s really disrespectful. That’s what it boils down to. Greg Vaughan aired just yesterday, in beautiful scenes welcoming Elizabeth to the Spencer family once more…while the network he airs on has already written him out of the Spencer clan. I know it’s not Jonathan Jackson’s fault. He’s got a family to feed, too, and a right to be employed. But someone needs to be held accountable for the bad taste here. I honestly thought the network had learned something from their own “real Greenlee” debacle, but it’s clear they haven’t.

Page me when my first love, the real GENERAL HOSPITAL, is back.

 

originally posted on soapoperaweekly.com

Cheering OLTL’s diversity

Posted in tv talk tagged , , , at 7:45 am by Mala

It’s been a while since I gushed about One Life to Live, so I figure there’s no harm in dusting off my pom-poms today. Catching up on the Oct. 20 episode (Hi, Kevin! Nice to see you!) hammered in for me again how well OLTL has done with integrating its cast and treating everyone like normal people. (Minorities are normal; yes, I know it’s shocking.) Sure, there’s a bit of a bubble, but it feels organic. Of course Rachel and the Evanses are going to be clustered around Shaun’s hospital room. It’s not just trotting out the black characters for the sake of token diversity…like the complete waste of Tamara Tunie when As the World Turns brought back Jessica for one episode last week. Not only was it the first time in a long time that we saw Chauntee Schuler’s Bonnie, but the whole set-up was ridiculous. Jessica flew in to tell Bonnie what most people already know: that Dusty is a commitmentphobe who’s Just Not That Into Her. Then, that was it. Bonnie went back to the backburner (maybe she’s hanging out with Jade, Dallas and Derek?), Jessica flew off for parts unknown and ATWT had done its good diversity deed for the quarter. How do you bring Jessica back and not have her in scenes with the rest of Oakdale? How do you actually write a solid  script that references Bonnie’s troubled relationship with her own daughter knowing that you’re not going to address it again for another four months, if you remember to do so at all?

And lest it look like I’m just calling out ATWT, don’t think I didn’t notice that Colleen’s newish Jewish (that rhymed!) heritage was left out of her death arc on Y&R. I know that Judaism is considered matrilineal, but still…where was Grandma Kaplan? Why were we hearing about a generic angel that Brad had given Colleen instead of a Star of David or a hamsa hand? It’s bad enough to erase Brad and Colleen from the canvas, but to scrub away their cultural background… it’s wrong. There is enough of that kind of behavior in the real world, taking away our voices, our identities. 

Maybe some soaps haven’t gotten this memo, but characters of color, religious minorities, and sexual minorities can sustain ongoing stories. We’re pretty good at doing it every day in our real lives. And that’s why I appreciate OLTL, which has the Evans family dealing with a soapy love triangle between brothers and the same woman, and Destiny’s crush on Matthew. Then there’s Markko and Langston, who are just teens being teens. Téa and Carlotta caught up this week. Cristian and Layla shared a sexy, dulce de leche-laced kiss…that was fraught with issues because of Cris’ history with Evangeline. And Fish got put on leave pending investigation by Internal Affairs…while Nick proposed to Kyle to help further Dorian and Amelia’s gay marriage initiative. None of this stuff is hit-and-run. It’s not just to go, “Hey, look, we remembered we have non-whites on our show! Give us a prize!” 

And that is a reward for viewers.

10.20.09

Video killed the radio star — or did it?

Posted in tv talk tagged at 10:25 am by Mala

We Love Soaps‘ Roger and Damon kicked off their premiere episode of WLS TV this week, and I got to be a part of it! Check it out! We dish the treatment of women in daytime (specifically GH and ATWT), the exit of Y&R’s Eric Braeden (Victor), and Dorian’s big, gay wedding on OLTL. Additionally, Damon and Roger do a hilarious “Soaps on the Street” segment with the denizens of Times Square, visit with Martha Byrne and company on the set of Gotham and chat with GL’s Karla Mosley (ex-Christina) and Lawrence Saint-Victor (ex-Remy) about their new web series, Wed-Locked.

Women, fashion and unintelligent design

Posted in general rambling tagged , at 7:44 am by Mala

I don’t understand the upper echelons of the fashion industry. I get that, objectively, you could look at it as a form of art, using cloth as a medium instead of paints or clay. But when it comes to creating things for people to actually wear, that’s when my brain starts to shut down.

Look, I shop at Old Navy and H&M. I cannot justify spending more than $40-50 bucks on a piece of clothing. I grew up in a family where being clothed was the vital thing, not how cool you looked, and as sullen I was about it at the time, looking back I appreciate that value being instilled in me. It probably comes from having a father who grew up in a rural village, worked his way through school and didn’t buy his first pair of lace-up formal shoes until college. (My dad is awesome, and I respect him so much for what he’s accomplished!)

So spending hundreds of dollars on a pair of cute high heels? Not my thing. I just don’t understand it. Why would you spend $600 or more on a shoe or a blouse? My skin actually crawls at the thought of wearing something that expensive, when that money could go towards rent or food or a vacation. Of course, seeing as how my freakishly small feet are the only part of me that could conceivably fit into a high end design, my bank account is safe. Because as someone who fluctuates between a size 10 and a size 12 at all times, I’m definitely not the target demo of your Ralph Laurens and Versaces. Hell, according to that world, I’m a fattie. Gasp.

This is hardly a new thing, what with sizes getting smaller and department store chains vanity sizing to make double digit women feel comparatively better about ourselves. But these past few months have been a truly eye-opening time when it comes to the fashion design biz. It’s like they’re not bothering to hide it anymore. Their ideal female is one grossly underweight and disproportionate. Beauty is less than a size zero. Beauty is too rich and too thin and way beyond the reach of the average woman.

Karl Lagerfeld thinks no one wants to see curvy women. Filippa Hamilton, the model infamously Photoshopped so skinny that she looked like a bobblehead doll, was fired for being overweight, when she’s 5′10 and weighs 120 pounds. Sought-after shoe designer Christian Louboutin created shoes for Mattel’s Barbie and thought Barbie’s ankles were too fat and altered her already ridiculous proportions. And then there’s October’s issue of French Vogue,featuring Dutch model Lara Stone in blackface, which is a whole separate level of WTF that I could go on and on about.

Perhaps all these cutting edge designs are tailored to make it easier to show one’s ass?
Read the rest of this entry »

Next page