12.04.09
Practice Makes Perfect, by Julie James
Practice Makes Perfect, by Julie James is one of those breezy, banter-y contemporary romances about a smart woman trading barbs with a borderline chauvinist man’s man, and the sexual tension therein. So, basically, it’s like reading a Rachel Gibson book…except that I’d actually recommend you read a Gibson book instead!
James has a decent set-up and dialogue that does make you laugh out loud, but from a technical standpoint, I found Practice Makes Perfect to be sloppy writing. I kept getting distracted by James’ complete lack of consistency, by her shifts in language use and tone, and the short-cuts she took during various moments that might have needed description. She really needed a better editor to sit her down and say, “Hey, pick a style and stick with it.” It’s like there were three different narrative voices…one of which, by the way, was Yoda’s: “Eight years it had been since they had moved into their respective offices…”
The contentious relationship between dueling lawyers Payton Kendall and J.D. Jameson hearkens back to Elizabeth and Darcy in Jane Austen’s Pride and Prejudice — and referencing the book actually provides one of the book’s best scenes — but, again, obviously, Austen did it better than James. The reader is supposed to empathize with Payton, whose mother is an ex-hippie activist, and her constant resentment of J.D., who comes from money. I’m sorry, what? The woman’s name is “Payton Kendall,” which is about as WASP-y as you can get, and she can afford Jimmy Choos and $80 brunches because she makes a six-figure salary as an associate at her firm. I am not going to buy her anti-elitism when she makes six-figures. Not to mention that she’s never heard of Tolstoy and doesn’t know what’s in a Tom Collins. I couldn’t figure out why I was supposed to root for her. That’s not to say I rooted for J.D. He was your average contemporary Alpha hero, and his name kept reminding me of J. Jonah Jameson, Peter Parker’s boss at the Daily Bugle!
It’s a cute book, but I got nothing out of reading it except a few chuckles — and I really wish I hadn’t spent money on it. Perhaps James and her book editor should’ve taken a tip from her book’s title: a little more practice would’ve been perfect.
12.02.09
Bed of Roses, by Nora Roberts
As I stood in the airport bookstore with the daunting task of picking some in-flight reading, my eyes began to glaze over. Bestsellers, entirely too many choices from the Twilight saga, Sarah Palin and Glenn Beck’s books, etc. And it came down to Iris Johansen’s The Treasure and Nora Roberts’ Bed of Roses. I loved Johansen’s early historicals, before she went all suspense thriller on us, and The Treasure seemed to hearken back to her beginnings. However, when I perused the back cover description and flipped it open to the first page, I realized that the cultural appropriation factor had the potential to be trauma-inducing. (Sheikhs, non-white male hero, etc.) And who wants a book they might throw against the emergency exit door, you know?
So, despite not having read the previous book in Roberts’ new series, I went with Bed of Roses. I’m not part of the movement that thinks Nora Roberts is the awesomest awesome when it comes to romance writing, but her books are dependable, for the most part consistent, and entertaining. (I had to give up on her a few years back when everything she wrote was a trilogy involving a brunette, a redhead and a blonde…that she’s doing it in a quartet this time and included a character with black hair is, I guess, an improvement?) You know what you’re getting into with her books: crisp dialogue, good stories, rootable heroes and heroines. And Bed of Roses was no different. Perhaps that was the basic problem…
11.27.09
When happily ever after fails…
As much as I love a happy ending, there’s something about love unfulfilled that I love even more. Heartbreak, thwarted souls torn apart by circumstance or fate… that longing and grief brings a whole different kind of satisfaction to me as a reader or a viewer. Because sometimes it’s not about happiness, it’s about being denied happiness and trying to find a way to live your life despite that. For most of us, I think that’s a more realistic proposition. Because, as the Rolling Stones once said, “You can’t always get what you want.”
One of the most romantic movies of all time is Roman Holiday. And, spoiler alert, there isn’t a happy ending. (Also? Rosebud is a sled, the ship hits an iceberg, he’s been dead the whole time and Darth Vader is Luke’s father.) I ache every time I see it, and I relish that ache. Joe and Ann cannot be together. We know this. It is impossible. He’s a reporter and she’s a princess. But their madcap adventures are no less gorgeous, and their love is made all the more poignant for it. When Joe drops her off around the corner from her quarters and they have that desperate moment…god, it kills me. And Gregory Peck is so noble, so very much the measure of a perfect man.
For more contemporary examples, there are couples like Firefly’s Mal and Inara. He’s no Gregory Peck and she’s not a princess by any means, but in the 14-episode run of the series and the feature film that followed, we still know that they can’t work out. As much as there is a palpable attraction between them and a connection, they are just too fundamentally different to make a go of it. And unlike the battle of Serenity Valley, where Mal was willing to fight a losing battle to the end, the war for their hearts is one where they’ve laid down their arms and walked off the field. Mal thinks Inara is really just a whore in fancy clothes, Inara values her independence and her pride, and never the twain shall meet. God, that’s awful. But I can’t help but root for them, and Nathan Fillion and Morena Baccarin make such a visually stunning pair.
Then there are some of my favorite soap opera couples, for whom the intensity of emotion is so much that it, not class differences or prejudices, is what keeps them apart. ATWT’s Carly and Jack are a whirlwind of passion, dysfunction, judgment and impulse, and they don’t necessarily work together in the domestic sense. Happily ever after always seems to be just out of their reach. And my absolutely favorite World Turns pairing, Simon and Katie…? As much as they care about each other, he’s not cut out to settle down. He and Katie are at different places in their lives. I know he can’t stay, but that doesn’t make me love every time he returns to her life any less.
And I keep returning to these stories. Not because I suddenly expect the ending to change, but because even though they don’t quite “get there,” the journey these characters take is compelling enough.
11.20.09
An unsatisfying experience with Unbound
The new urban fantasy anthology Unbound, featuring short stories from Kim Harrison, Jeaniene Frost, Jocelynn Drake, Vicki Petterson and Melissa Marr kind of left me cold. Harrison’s young adult novel Once Dead Twice Shy presupposed that the reader knew the heroine from the anthology Prom Dates From Hell. And that’s the feeling that I got with several of the offerings in this anthology: that they were excerpts from the author’s larger arc, meant to be “extras” for people already familiar with their universes.
Read the rest of this entry »
Soap Opera Weekly: Blogging With Mala
Today I was completely enthralled by a highly-anticipated character being introduced via an art show. No, I don’t mean James Franco on GH. I mean Paul Leyden’s Simon Frasier on ATWT! Franco may have that appealing mop of curls, a darling smile, and the ability to portray a vicious edge with ease, but expert thief Simon has been stealing daytime hearts for far longer!
The return of Katie’s first love is something I’m always clamoring for. Especially since his gig in ‘06 saw Simon romancing Carly instead of his former wife. The few scenes Simon and Katie shared back then were sizzling and even though it spelled doom for her marriage to Mike, I loved that they couldn’t deny their passion. I mean, normally I’m anti-cheating, but, dude, they’re soulmates. So, you know what…? I have to agree with Mike and Jack that seeking out Simon is the best way to get through to Katie as she goes through one of the worst experiences of her life. He may be felonious, untrustworthy, and a complete cad but he loves Katie — that’s one thing about him that’s never been a con!
That’s not to say that I think Skatie needs to do the mattress tango this time around, because that would be completely disrespectful to Brad. And cheating on a living spouse is one thing (sorry, Mike!) but when the spouse is actually a ghost who has to watch you get it on…? It’s more than a little gross. So it’s really the emotional connection between Simon and Katie that I’m gearing up for.
Like John and Natalie on OLTL this week. They’re another couple that I’ve always had a yen for. And when John bore the brunt of Natalie’s anger over Jared’s death and then held her as she fell apart, my heart broke. Yes, I’m aware that Natalie losing husbands seems to be foreplay for these two, considering that the last time they got close it was in the wake of Cristian’s “death.” But that’s so not what I got out of their scenes. I loved that Michael Easton and Melissa Archer conveyed the characters’ natural comfort with one another so easily, and I bought that John was the only one who could bring Nat a small measure of peace — as well as shoulder the weight of her fury and guilt.
Sometimes an old friend, an old love, is just who you need to help heal a fresh wound.
originally posted on soapoperaweekly.com
11.19.09
Soap Opera Weekly: Blogging With Mala
As much as I adore B&B with every fiber of my being, it annoyed me a little this week to see Ann (the fabulous Betty White) get dropped off at Paradise Cove by a South Asian cabbie.
I know what you’re thinking: “Mala, shouldn’t you be happy there was a brown person on the show? And one who had lines, at that?” Okay, yes. It’s nice. But it’s also really frustrating because B&B’s idea of proper representation for a person of color is…as a cab driver? That’s the natural assumption? Let me clarify: This is like when Marcus showed up at the Forrester mansion last year and Eric thought he was a waiter. It’s relegating characters of color to a socioeconomic status “befitting” their race or ethnicity. Like, “of COURSE a Bangladeshi/Indian guy is going to be Ann’s taxi driver.”
Look, I live in New York. I will not deny that every other cab I get into is driven by someone from my parents’ homeland, but there are also other jobs that South Asians fill. We’re journalists, doctors, students, Dunkin Donuts’ cashiers, shoe salesmen, etc. We’re in every walk of life. When you have B&B’s whitewashed Los Angeles, where up until Justin and Marcus joined the show every contract character was Caucasian, it’s a different story. There is no other minority representation on the show. And theonly South Asian character with actual lines being such a stereotype definitely tripped my perimeter alarms.
Here’s the thing: Those of us in the viewing audience don’t just notice people like ourselves onscreen, we long for it. If I can get this keyed up about a dayplayer cabbie, imagine how I might react to a Mumbai businessman jetting in and sweeping Steffy off her feet or Dr. Caspary consulting with an Indian physician about the fruit of Sandy and Bridget’s wombs?
originally posted on soapoperaweekly.com
11.18.09
Nothing new under the Hollywood sun
With the news of a Charlie’s Angels reboot being conceived for next year’s TV season, I can only continue to shake my head at how Hollywood is out of ideas. I mean, this is an industry that is remaking films that came out in the ’80s. I don’t care if it’s a horror movie like The Stepfather or the Chace Crawford-Julianne Hough re-imagining of Footloose (just typing that gave me hives), I don’t understand why it’s necessary.
Sometimes a reboot or remake does strike gold — look at JJ Abrams‘ wildly successful and awesome Star Trek — but it takes a very special balance of great script, great cast and originality to make something like that work. You never want to give the impression that your project is a case of, “Oh, shit, we have nothing on our roster so let’s dust off something old.”
As much as I can joke about how Jonathan Jackson’s return to General Hospital as Lucky is his extended audition for a 21 Jump Street movie, I’m actually quite serious: He would be great for such a project and if I were casting it, he’d be a lock as a 21st Century Tom Hanson (a permanent lock, even!). Fresh-faced Amber Tamblyn (ex-Emily, GH), who was pushing Jump Street herself by playing a cop on ABC’s short-lived The Unusuals, would also be perfect in an all-new role or even a modern variation on Penhall’s abrasive but good-hearted girlfriend Dorothy — now a cop herself instead of the stay-at-home spouse.
The series ran for four years, has a cult following, but also isn’t so sacred that touching it would make people freak out. And given the right story, it could be a great film. Especially if they got Johnny Depp to stop pretending that’s not where he started his career and he could make a cameo appearance as Captain Jenko (the original Jump Street squad captain before Steven Williams‘ Fuller). It could be dark, edgy, but also with a strong thread of wit: just like the show.
Of course, given the trend Hollywood seems to follow with its television show-to-movie pitches, it would end up more like a camp comedy, like the Charlie’s Angels movies and Dukes of Hazzard: lampooning the show rather than embracing what people loved about it. I was truly horrified by Dukes, as that series was a huge part of my childhood, and seeing earnest daredevils Bo and Luke reduced to idiotic buffoons was painful.
What would be less painful would be to see Hollywood actually start producing and releasing more fresh material instead of defaulting to tired remakes. There are hungry, talented writers out there just waiting to be discovered. The film industry just has to take a chance and…cut loose.
Soap Opera Weekly: Blogging With Mala
So, GH has James Franco for sweeps, and Y&R, which has been teasing a recast of Malcolm Winters for months, brings in…Darius McCrary?! (Better known to most people as Eddie, the not-so-bright son on the ’90s sitcom FAMILY MATTERS.) I’m looking forward to seeing what he does with the role, but still…huh?
This is hardly the first time the show has pulled from that era’s sitcom lineup for its talent. There’s THE FRESH PRINCE OF BEL AIR’s Tatyana M. Ali as the woefully underused Roxanne (give this fabulous woman a real story!), McCrary’s fellow FAMILY MATTERS alum Bryton McClure as the equally underused but at least critically acclaimed Devon, and BOY MEETS WORLD’s William Russ as new character Tucker. I’d also almost count Yvonne Zima (Daisy) because her sister Madeline was Grace on THE NANNY and they look startlingly similar. And speaking of sisters, Y&R’s sister soap B&B does boast the totally awesome Patrick Duffy (of STEP BY STEP fame) as Stephen — but he has soap background as well, having been on DALLAS.
So, color me confused. Why the influx of notable sitcom actors? I know Y&R has gotten all loony in recent months, but does this mean it is going to start filming in front of a live studio audience and adding a laugh track?
I’m not trying to knock the actors; I just think the association is so different. Stacy Haiduk (Patty/Emily) did AMC before this and has a huge backlist of prime-time drama experience.Wilson Bethel (Ryder) came from the lauded mini-series GENERATION KILL. And powerhouse Ted Shackelford (Jeffrey, ex-Will), of course, hails from KNOTS LANDING and DALLAS. Plus, and this is a big one, they all came in with roles that are tied to the canvas but still essentially new! We didn’t learn MJ was Patty until long after the character had been on the scene, so we didn’t have a preconceived notion of how Haiduk should have played her.
I don’t know how McCrary tracks as Malcolm, of all characters! Shemar Moore made an impact in that role, as both a “hunk” and Lily’s biological father. And with this casting note, all I can think is that Steve Urkel’s going to burst in any second asking Malcolm and Lily if they have any cheese!
That’s not to say that I don’t think familiar prime-time actors can make the crossover to soaps. Of course they can. McClure did, Ali did, ditto for Duffy. And Joseph C. Phillips went from being Denise’s husband on THE COSBY SHOW to playing GH’s Justus! It just has to make sense.
For instance, if we’re doing wishful ’90s sitcom casting…how about Jasmine Guy as Drucilla? (I’m going to ignore the fact that she’s playing Bonnie’s grandmother on THE VAMPIRE DIARIES. Oh my God, I feel so old.) She’s gorgeous, she’s a great actress, and she has enough distance from A DIFFERENT WORLD’s Whitley Gilbert that no one would expect her to look at Neil and bust out with “Dwaaaaaynnnne” in Whit’s trademark nasal whine. And how has Nicholle Tom (THE NANNY) not landed on the same soap that both her brother, David, and sister, Heather, cut their teeth on?
I think bringing in new actors from unexpected places is admirable and applaud Y&R for trying, but they might want to look back at some of the choices they made this year and ask Urkel’s favorite question: “Did I do that?”
originally posted on soapoperaweekly.com
11.17.09
A random links post!
So, yes, I haven’t really been in a blogging frame of mind, but I have been in a reading, laughing, and self-educating state of mind. Here’s a round-up of some things that I’ve stumbled upon lately:
How To Tell If Your Pain Is Manpain (Self-explanatory hilarity!)
One man acapella group Sam Tsui sings the Don’t Stop Believin’ arrangement from Glee and also does a really cool medley of Michael Jackson songs.
Meep and Meep. (And also? Meep!)
Lady Gaga’s official YouTube Channel. (Yes, I’ve just started delving into the Gaga phenomenon, and oh my god she’s fascinating! I need someone to explain her videos to me!)
The Strange Case of Glenn Beck by The Brown Tweed Society (a really interesting look at trademark disputes).
Patrick Duffy and The Crab discuss their first times (This entire series of videos is comedy gold.)
11.16.09
Updates from La Casa Mala
I’ve been on a big of a blogging hiatus, as my creative spirit battles it out with the onset of winter. I just don’t do well with cold weather. My instinct is to hibernate, both physically and emotionally. Of course, the peril of Internet silence is that if you let it stretch on too long, you become a nonentity, quickly forgotten as people move on to more immediate sources of entertainment.
So here’s a slapdash update, as I get the rant machine revved up again.
I’m still working my way through Liz Carlyle’s backlist, currently reading No True Gentleman. I haven’t watched much in the way of movies lately, and I sent Bad Education back to Netflix unwatched because a)I wasn’t in the mood to sit through it and b)Pedro Almodovar signed that fricking Polanski petition. I keep going back and forth as to whether I want to see This Is It and Precious, both of which have gotten rave reviews. And my sense is that I can’t watch either of them in the theater. I think — for different reasons, obviously — both films are just too personal and emotional to share with a big crowd of moviegoers. I need to be in my pajamas, with tissues and comfort food nearby.
Speaking of which, I’m really proud of myself because I’ve nailed a standard Bengali comfort food recipe. Khichuri, often served after prayer services, is a mix of rice, lentils and spices and is one of my favorite rainy/cold day foods. It’s like chicken soup or chili, something that just spells home. Between this and somewhat mastering chana masala (a chickpea dish), I feel like I’m really getting a handle on traditional Indian cooking once more. At some point, I have to start making chicken curry again. I was really good at it back when I lived in Ohio. Haven’t made it in New York, though.
I’m trying to balance my non-soap TV viewing as best I can, but when you watch upwards of 20 hours a week for work it gets exhausting. I had to jettison Castle (sorry, Nathan Fillion!) because the Monday at 10 spot was brutal. I’m a week behind on How I Met Your Mother. I make sure to tune in to NCIS and The Good Wife on Tuesdays, Glee on Wednesdays, and The Vampire Diaries/Supernatural on Thursdays. If I’m awake, I watch White Collar live on Friday nights at 10, but I mostly catch it On Demand on Saturday or Sunday.
Aaand that’s pretty much it for me at the moment.
Not too thrilling, eh?